Research Topic For Psychology

now browsing by category

 

The share of a reproduction paper is based on analyses of as well as in insights into current methods and problems—plus the certainty that is added includes validating past outcomes.

  1. Relevance: Is this paper highly relevant to COLING?
  2. Readability/clarity: could be the paper well-structured and well-written?
  3. Data/code access: may be the data/code (as appropriate) open to the study community or perhaps is here a compelling reason offered why this is simply not feasible?
  4. Analysis: In the event that paper surely could reproduce the total outcomes of the previous work, does it obviously set down exactly exactly what would have to be filled in to carry out so? It clearly identify what information was missing/the likely causes if it wasn’t able to replicate the results of earlier work, does?
  5. Generalizability: Does the paper rise above replicating the total results in the initial to explore whether or not they is reproduced an additional environment? Instead, in situations of non-replicability, does the paper talk about the wider implications of this result?
  6. Informativeness: To exactly what degree does the analysis reported into the paper deepen our knowledge of the methodology utilized or even the problem approached? Will the given information when you look at the paper assistance professionals due to their range of technique/resource?
  7. Significant contrast: along with pinpointing the experimental outcomes being replicated, does the paper motivate why these specific email address details are a target that is important reproduction and just what the near future implications are of the having been reproduced or been discovered to be non-reproducible?
  8. General suggestion: there are numerous submissions that are good for slots at COLING 2018; essential can it be to feature that one? Read More >
^
Twitter IconZimbra E-MailZimbra E-MailZimbra E-Mail